In a major legal blow to two prominent individuals, the Supreme Court of India has denied bail to former IAS officer K. Dhanunjay Reddy and P. Krishna Mohan Reddy, the former Officer on Special Duty to Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, the president of the YSR Congress Party. The two men were seeking anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged liquor scam that occurred during the previous state government’s tenure.
The Supreme Court’s decision means that Dhanunjay Reddy and Krishna Mohan Reddy now face the prospect of arrest, as the investigation into the liquor scam continues. The case has garnered significant attention, with the alleged corruption scheme said to have taken place while the YSR Congress Party was not in power in the state.
According to the details of the case, the former IAS officer and the ex-Officer on Special Duty are accused of being involved in irregularities and improprieties related to the state’s liquor trade during the previous regime. The alleged scam is believed to have caused significant financial losses to the state exchequer, prompting the authorities to launch a thorough investigation.
The Supreme Court’s decision to deny the anticipatory bail petitions of Dhanunjay Reddy and Krishna Mohan Reddy has been viewed as a significant setback for the two individuals. Legal experts suggest that the court’s ruling indicates the gravity of the allegations and the strength of the evidence gathered by the investigating agencies.
The case has become politically charged, with the YSR Congress Party accusing the current state government of targeting its leaders and supporters. However, the authorities have maintained that the investigation is being conducted in a fair and impartial manner, and that no individual is above the law.
The denial of anticipatory bail means that Dhanunjay Reddy and Krishna Mohan Reddy may now be arrested and questioned by the authorities as the investigation into the alleged liquor scam continues. The outcome of the case is likely to have significant political and legal implications, both for the individuals involved and the overall political landscape in the state.
